Light And Darkness Series

[Steven Stiffler]

This is the new light and darkness series

http://img69.imageshack.us/img69/2263/325674m.jpg

http://img717.imageshack.us/img717/1558/325674.jpg

http://img717.imageshack.us/img717/2365/325674j.jpg

http://img717.imageshack.us/img717/1456/325674i.jpg

http://img707.imageshack.us/img707/9585/325674t.jpg

http://img707.imageshack.us/img707/3006/325674v.jpg

[mad]

i think theyr really good i think just amke sure u specify how often angel can use its effect but other wise i like =) ilol be putting more card on my thread soon to

[Steven Stiffler]

yeah it took like 15 mins to make

[Spiff!]

Oh dear lord, have you even read real cards?

Please do so, and make these cards more like them in wording.

[Odin el Padre de los Aesir]

Do not capitalize the whole name.
LOADS of OCG errors.

[Steven Stiffler]

well on realcard they are capatalized
and they look more like real cards than some and the pics are hard to find

and what is wrong with them

---------- Post added March 28th, 2010 at 01:22 PM ----------

which one looks the best

[mad]

well on realcard they are capatalized
and they look more like real cards than some and the pics are hard to find

and what is wrong with them

---------- Post added March 28th, 2010 at 01:22 PM ----------

which one looks the best
i rekon the light and darkness magician looks mad

[Sayokyoku]

Being a Gin-sama fan, I can't give an honest opinion on the matter. XD

Who cares if he's using the wrong wording? It's not like the effects are long or convoluted. They are a bit generic tho.

[Steven Stiffler]

they are cool

[Odin el Padre de los Aesir]

well on realcard they are capatalized
and they look more like real cards than some and the pics are hard to find

and what is wrong with them

---------- Post added March 28th, 2010 at 01:22 PM ----------

which one looks the best

No.
Dont capitalize the whole world.
Just the first letter of each word.
:/

[Steven Stiffler]

Yeah but real cards are capitalised

[Odin el Padre de los Aesir]

OMG lol
Just look what happened when I didnt capitalize the whole name
http://img707.imageshack.us/img707/5936/203576.jpg
See.
Now you were wrong the whole time.

[Steven Stiffler]

yeah but in real life they are capitalised so you are wrong

[ElectroBlade]

You really need to re-word these.

[Steven Stiffler]

what do you mean and these were my first cards

[Odin el Padre de los Aesir]

yeah but in real life they are capitalised so you are wrong

No you are wrong.
Look at my card.
See its still capitalized but the whole name isnt HUGE.

[ElectroBlade]

I meant re-word the effects so they match the proper card "grammar". Also, don't use all caps for the title. I know the letters will be capital either way, but don't type them in as capitals.

[teramaster]

The artists who spent their time making those images have no credits which would reward their effort... sad.
How does card #3 recruit a spell? Once per turn? When exactly? How many times? (Overpowered anyway.)
The continuous spell has the same problem. When exactly? How many times?

Ph yeah, the art on Light and Darkness Magician is a fanart of teh Anniversary pack Dark Magician. Basically, you simply renamed Dark Magician there.

The Dark Magician fanart belongs to Riomak from deviantART.

Oh, and on YugiohCardMaker, Card equals CARD. Get it?

Heaven
Each "Light and Darkness" monster on the field gains 600 ATK and cannot be destroyed by battle.

Knight: When this monster destroys a non-Warrior-Type monster by battle, it gains 100 ATK at the end of Damage Step.

Angel (overpowered version)
Once per turn, you can add 1 Spell card from your Graveyard to your hand. (See effect of Dark Eruption for reference. The "once per turn" also means during your Main Phase.)

Angel (balanced out)
Once per turn, you can discard 2 "Light and Darkness" cards from your hand to add 1 Spell card from your Graveyard to your hand.

Magician
1 Spellcaster-type Tuner + 1 Spellcaster-type non-Tuner monster + 1 "Light and Darkness" monster (at least that's what I get from how you worded it)
This card gains 500 ATK and DEF for each Spellcaster-type monster in either player's Graveyard.

Paladin (edited version)
This legendary paladin is known for slaying dragons. (Full-stop.)

Power of LaD (overpowered)
Once per turn, during your Main Phase, you can Special Summon 1 "Light and Darkness" monster from your hand or Deck. All face-up "Light and Darkness" monsters gain 600 ATK.

Power of LaD (balanced out)
Once per turn, during your Main Phase, you can Special Summon 1 "Light and Darkness" monster from your hand. All face-up "Light and Darkness" monsters gain 600 ATK.

[Steven Stiffler]

ok well i like them

[mad]

wow very bad.
1 the effects have no correlation to the decks purpose for like how lightsworns discard.
2 the pictures arent any good
3 the effect are poorly worded
4 the names are all in caps
5 OCG errors
6 the cards have no resemblence

[Steven Stiffler]

its not to do with light sworns

[KING OF NIGERIA]

its not to do with light sworns

That's not his point. He's saying that the cards are only related by name, and that they should have a common theme and support each other, like how Lightsworns mill cards and benefit from it, or how Crystal Beasts can be placed in the Spell/Trap zone and support each other that way.

[Steven Stiffler]

well they were my first cards and which i made years ago

[KING OF NIGERIA]

It's never too late to fix them.

[Steven Stiffler]

well i could but i only posted them for fun it is not like they will be made

[Jonny]

Why post them if you're going to criticize the constructive criticism you are receiving? I don't understand why people do this at all.
"Oh, tell me what you think about..."
"Well, it's okay, but it could be fixed or made better by..."
"Yeah, well screw you too, jerk."
"Lolwut?"
If you're posting your cards here then you are actively showing them for critiquing purposes. If you don't want people to tell you how to make them better, then don't post them and stare at them yourself, because honestly, after looking at your cards, I think we've all had a little brain damage. Your wording is terrible, the names are gargantuan, and the effects are all generic "do this" effects that don't support the archetype in any way. I know all of this has been said, but hell, repetition helps you to memorize things.

Tl;dr

Your cards could be good, if they would learn to work together.

[Sayokyoku]

i think theyr really good i think just amke sure u specify how often angel can use its effect but other wise i like =) ilol be putting more card on my thread soon to


wow very bad.
1 the effects have no correlation to the decks purpose for like how lightsworns discard.
2 the pictures arent any good
3 the effect are poorly worded
4 the names are all in caps
5 OCG errors
6 the cards have no resemblence

First you say they're good, now you say they're bad. Pick a side. -.-;


OMG lol
Just look what happened when I didnt capitalize the whole name
http://img707.imageshack.us/img707/5936/203576.jpg
See.
Now you were wrong the whole time.

http://j.imagehost.org/0548/x-o-d-ah.jpg

Oh no, I changed Exodia's name. Now he's no as good as before. Q.Q

[Steven Stiffler]

cool

[SawronZXZ]

Magician is Sexy. With a capital S.

[mad]

[QUOTE=Sayokyoku;671862]First you say they're good, now you say they're bad. Pick a side. -.-;

i was just being polite at the start but then thought id say what i thought=)

[Sayokyoku]

I think deciding to change sides halfway thru makes matters worse, but oh well.

[mad]

I think deciding to change sides halfway thru makes matters worse, but oh well.
yea but to be honest i wouldnt normally come out straight away saying "horrible" d just list where improvements r needed but i thought id do it bak.

[mad]

I think deciding to change sides halfway thru makes matters worse, but oh well.
yea but to be honest i wouldnt normally come out straight away saying "horrible" d just list where improvements r needed but i thought id do it bak.

[Steven Stiffler]

ok well it was cause i critisized his cards

[mad]

yea cause i asked for opinions not "wow very bad", then talking about the pictured rather then important stuff of th ecard like the effects?